One of the criticisms that the moderators / staff of the StackExchange community seem to have brought up is the lack of turnaround between commitment sign ups and beta users.
Specifically these comments from @JNAt:
This thread captures a look into that issue, and hopefully enables clarification from the moderator community about the behavior.
First, the community size that is required to leave the commitment phase and enter beta is 200 committers. On top of that, 100 committers have to have had at least 200+ reputation on other StackExchange sites.
Anything beyond that is "extra" from the metrics provided to the community stewards.
There is then there is a long tail of users with 50 or less reputation, who are categorized as new users who are interested in this topic.
Among those that made referrals in the commitment phase, one person stands out in particular:
If we do some basic look into the referrals this user made, most of them seem to be brand new StackExchange users. Here is just an example page:
It seems to me this is unfortunately an example of someone reaching out to their community to "pump up" the commitment numbers, where these individuals have not really ended up engaging our beta community.
Obviously this is NOT representative of our overall community, and we did NOT need these users to pass your bar, however, it seems now these users are being used AGAINST us when trying to qualify the quality of our proposal.
The conversion from our StackExchange commitment to our Beta took around 3 months. In that time, we went through holidays, a new year, and, if you keep up with the news, the world around us has changed quite a bit.
In general, the moderators and staff are looking for "an explosion of activity" from these committers, but have also contributed to killing the flame by having such a delayed process.
We are sorry we proposed our StackExchange community near Christmas.
Now we are in Beta, and only a private beta, we can actually get a feeling of how many users are in our community.
JNat points out that "only 22% showed up" yet, our beta now has over 900 users, which is a 40% increase over our ENTIRE commitment community.
The Substrate community does not want to encourage or need help from "pumping up numbers" by community who are not actually interested with engaging our StackExchange community.
As you can understand, we cannot control the actions of others, but similarly, we should NOT be punished by those actions either.
I suggest you remove all of the referrals from Ray, and future measurements of the success of our site be qualified against the REAL numbers that our community brings to this site.
It seems completely unjustified at this point to qualify the lack of success of this proposal to this metric, and if the staff or moderators disagree, I would like to hold that conversation of why here.
Otherwise, I would appreciate confirmation that we are satisfying this criteria, and doing so in a completely natural way.